This is a post taken from facebook, by a Susan Maunder who obviously supports the RSPCA, her post has been taken and her points answered, what a pity the media never give victims of the RSPCA the right to reply like this when they print their stories in their newspapers. Susan Maunders comments are in black with responses in red and bracketed.
Susan Maunder
to all you RSPCA haters read and weep
( Why would haters weep, laugh maybe …)
I feel this needs to be said, and shared, so please copy and paste and share...
The rspca is a charity and it's time we stopped treating them like a government service…
(Time they stopped acting like a government service)
People say the rspca are useless that they're only interested when the cameras are there or when the animals dead or dying, these are simply not true.
( Where is your proof to substantiate that claim? Plenty of proof out there to prove otherwise)
A)look at how many animals the rspca rescue every year,
(Rescue or steal, take from loving homes under false pretences?)
now go and find all those news stories, I challenge you...
(Challenge accepted and I cannot find one which has actually been rescued, taken as above yes but not rescued, because the ones which do need rescuing do not get rescued they get left to die )
And b) the rspca can only have an animal removed with veterinary support of suffering or potential suffering, if the rspca don't remove an animal then it's not because they're useless, or don't care, it's because there's no legal grounds to do so. Just because you think an animal is suffering, unless you are a vet, your opinion stands for nothing in the eyes of the law…
( Suffering or may suffer, that is a big difference to the actual offence of UNNECESSARRY SUFFERING, yet they abuse this law to get their hands on animals so they can then create offences which SIMPLY AREN’T TRUE! When have legal grounds ever stopped the RSPCA? More like no owner to prosecute)
I see the daily mail story of 53000 animals a year put to sleep by them... Tabloids print headlines that sell, not the truth...
( Great we agree on something, especially when they are printing RSPCA stories, not the truth)
What they conveniently didn't say was how many of those were wildlife casualties. Such as rtc deer, foxes, badgers, myxy rabbits, birds attacked by cats etc etc..... Because when you say that, it's not such a dramatic headline and doesn't sell papers.…
(Wildlife obviously don’t matter in the RSPCA’s eyes if they kill so many)
I see the story of 11 Arabs put to sleep... This was a very sad outcome, however. If you have more animals than you have space for and a limited financial budget it simply isn't possible to keep taking animals in....
( So why do RSPCA continue to do this)
And if there were homes for them, why didn't those homes take in some of the hundreds of horses already in the care of the rspca and waiting for homes…
(
Because these were specific breed people and had a specific interest in that breed of horse)
The rspca hasn't put a rehomeable animal to sleep since 2017, costing them millions more, yet do they get extra support to do this? No…
(I think you will find they claim not have PTS a rehomeable (sic) animal at any of their centres, a carefully worded cop out!)
People talk about the charity being corrupt, next time you see this please ask for the evidence..…
(There is plenty, please do ask as hundreds of people out there are wanting to show it to people)
People say the rspca is too political… This is the hunting lobby, who think chasing a fox across the country, and letting a pack of dogs tear it apart is humane....
( Do your homework, it is not only the hunting fraternity who say RSPCA are too political!)
I hope those people have never heard a fox torn apart, if they have and they still think it's humane then they have no empathy at all...
( WOW where was RSPCA’s empathy when they shot those GSD’s with a bolt gun? Or electrocute dogs in water? Have you heard those animals screams? Because plenty have!)
Then you have stag hunting, please go and look up the affects of stress on deer, and then tell me it's humane…
(Then you have ripping animals from what they know, thrown in strange places where no one loves them as they are just a means to a prosecution for the RSPCA, is that humane?, I think not)
And next time you see an rspca post, if someone comments with clear anger. The saying, he doth protest too much is so true…
( Are you not protesting too much, right here right now?!)
Try googling the name, yes people who the rspca have prosecuted are on social media..
(When you have done that contact them and ask them for the evidence as mentioned above about corruption )
And they want vengeance for being held to account for what they did or didn't do....
(Incorrect they want JUSTICE )
They want to see the rspca fold…
( That could be correct, because they want something that is FAIR and works for both animals and humans alike)
I see people say the rspca are rich, they can afford it..... Please go and look up their accounts at the charity commission website.... Go see for yourself... It costs the rspca £150 MILLION a year to do what they do.
(£150 million a year to neglect other peoples animals and prosecute people for crimes that did not take place, suppose training to lie and misuse laws is expensive)
Are they prefect, of course not. It's an organisation made up of human beings, show me one human who's never made a mistake…
( Exactly, yet this CHARITY prosecutes others for making mistakes)
However think what this country would be like without an rspca??????
( That sounds very appealing)
Sharing negative rspca posts or commenting negatively without doing a bit of homework first to see if what you're posting is true results in only 1 thing.... Less money to the rspca and in turn they can do less, not more…
( Good it is working, keep it up is what I say, keep posting the TRUTH)
So if you ever find yourself in a position where you need the help of the rspca, please don't ever have shared a negative post, made a negative comment or not donated yourself... To do otherwise is hypocritical…
(
Help and RSPCA in the same sentence? Now that is hypocritical, or just plain ignorant. Do not worry I would never ring the RSPCA for help with anything, no one should, however if that negative post is the truth then why should it not be shared )
Now the rspca is facing a £40 million defecit. If having read this you are thinking oh, then maybe take action now, donate and help the charity continue to be there. Even if that's sadly in a reduced capacity…
( Thankfully I am not thinking that at all, I will not tell you what I am thinking, I will leave that to your imagination!!)